this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
374 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

58143 readers
5203 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Any Chromium and Firefox browser prior to version 116 will be vulnerable to this, update your browsers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lantern@lemmy.world 64 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Further solidifying webp as the worst image format.

[–] chameleon@kbin.social 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The current advisory is in webm (VP8 specifically). The webp one was 2 weeks ago. ...yeah, not a good time for web browsers lately...

(edit: noticed OP actually did link the webp one, I thought it'd be CVE-2023-5217 because that's being linked elsewhere)

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

WebP is currently the smallest and highest quality format accepted by browsers today. I have no idea why you think so negatively of it, but it's irreplaceable until something better is widely adopted, and thus viable.

It's the best format for websites as of this exact moment.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Highest compression, not highest quality (arguably).

Also heavy compression which takes more resources to display.

Also poor compatibility outside browsers.

afaik it's basically still just VP8 in image format with added metadata, and google refuses to support alternatives because they like to own the browser market.

I think there was gonna be a webp and webm 2, but it never happened.

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

The only reason that’s the case is because Google axed the JPEGXL implementation

[–] Espi@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

AVIF is supported everywhere and it's fantastic

[–] synceDD@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

? I dont like it because I'm uneducated so it's bad, average voter