this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
392 points (99.5% liked)

politics

21225 readers
5199 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] punksnotdead@slrpnk.net 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

https://youtu.be/j51HZncBvEI

He's centre right, of course he dislikes communism.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Democratic socialism with a heavy fucking leash on Capitalism is likely the best system.

Braces for tomatoes

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No tomato throwing here because I just wish it were true because it sounds simple. But I just don't think it works. So long as work exploitation and the profit motive persist, any gains will always be precarious. I mean, it's much harder to build something than to tear it down, as we also see with the DOGE monkey business. We have to win every time but they have to win once.

So I would argue that certain fundamental moral imperatives would have to be codified as inalienable rights, constitutionally and declaratively. So for example it should come to be considered illegal and morally repugnant to rent humans, just as it is to buy them. It should also be considered illegal hoarding and gross to pass down intergenerational ownership of capital ("passive assets", "investments", and the like, I'm not talking about personal property).

But the thing is once stuff like that are enacted, there is no longer anything to be called "capitalism" any more.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

We still need people to perform basic functions, and capitalism is a way to do that. "Renting humans" as it were. I think we can certainly raise the minimum a fair bit. Higher minimum wage works being everyone up. I think we could and should get the working week down from 40 hours to 35. That takes covering a full seven day week from 4.2 shifts to 4.8 (or five with a bit of overlap).

Agree on the estate tax. It used to be a thing. Republicans had ground it down over the years, and just recently finished it off.

Universal healthcare does a ton for freedom and entrepreneurship.

When you spread the money thin, it does run out quickly. But I think we can still afford those things if we just actually tax billionaires and corporations. And stop taxing payroll more than capital investment. Usury is a sin. Anything they makes money from having money needs a big leash.

And of course money nearly all the way out of politics.

I'm not looking for a radical change from what we had before.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I know, I know, but I was caught up in the rest of what he was saying. Thanks for the link.