this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
856 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
5302 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (9 children)

Unpopular opinion: we don't need freaking internet from satellites, just get cat6 in every home and everyone is happy. I'm sure the cost would be lower then having to launch 999999.91 satellites to have similar speeds

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 22 minutes ago

Exactly! Amazon can ship it to you for like 10 bucks. Problem solved!

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

cat 6 in every home lol. you have any idea about range of cat 6? I mean, any?

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

~50m for cat6, ~100 cat6a, enough to get you to a switching box where you connect to fiber.

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

You do if you're fighting a war against Putin and the ketamine troll is threatening to turn off your internet.

[–] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Now get rid of the home and the cable, how do you cover 99.9% of the earth? Nomads need satellite, and so do rural homes too far from an isp fiber/copper endpoint But yes, if starlink has it done, why double the satellites to do it again with a different name? Because it's easier to launch 1000 more satellites than dismantle the system that enables such feats.

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

There are remote areas where cable won’t reach. For example, I need surveillance on a remote farm and I would love to get internet there.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 4 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Cable will reach anywhere. There is not such a place that cable "will not reach". Is there a profit incentive to serve you as a customer in a capitalist system? Maybe not. But cable will reach.

[–] MoonHawk@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure if you are in Europe, but in the US there are places where you could walk the width of Germany and see 100 houses. It does not serve to be technically correct here. Also, how would that work with boats / other vehicles and places without infrastructures?

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

There are exceptions, but in most cases (in Europe) hardwire should work fine. The problem is that starlink is advertised for any use case.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

I know plent of places in my European country where cable does reach, but was made for landline phones and cannot carry any data for internet because its so far from the nearest distribution center. even wireless like microwave can't sustain more than a quality camera feed

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Well, cable will not reach a warzone which is a rather pertinent use for a satellite communication system at present.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You'd need signal boosters at regular intervals, which need power... so now you're running multiple cables.

But you can't run them too close together as the power will induce noise in the data cable.

And after a long distance even the power needs boosting.

And to protect the cables, you'd need to bury them or put them on poles. Separately.

At a certain point, cable becomes the expensive option...

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Usually fiber is used between cities and in cities and copper is for the "last mile". Usually there is a switching box for the street / building complex

[–] EstonianGuy@lemm.ee 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

One broken cable can result in a city/town without internet. Speaking from experience.

Also satellites have other uses like GPS

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I doubt they use the same satellites for GPS

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I understand, but that is the exception. Even in your case probably getting 4G / 5G to that area would be cheaper / easier long term. Also Europe has a relatively high density compared with other continents

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I’m in Italy and outside cities, the Internet is still horrendous. And as I said, if you have a remote farm or garden, which are fairly common here, then you are on your own. Sim based internet is a thing, but there are monthly limits which are risky when you need surveillance and automation to be always live.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Cat 6A caps out at like 330 ft. Also thats a ton of copper.

Fiber optic nonprofit utilities makes more sense in cities and in rural areas we should just subsidize cell phone data plans.

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I didn't say that cat6 should be used everywhere, usually is just for "last mile delivery" get it from your home to a switching box that has fiber.

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

Bring back ethernet jacks on phones!

[–] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

supporting this motion

[–] bhsuarez@infosec.pub 1 points 10 hours ago

Not unpopular but I think they are just trying to grab some of SpaceX market share in this space (no pun intended). I agree cable is better but these folks are trying to make money.