this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
53969 readers
1070 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
💰 Please help cover server costs.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cross swarms by v2 feature is not implemented yet in any client I know, yes, the latest versions of BiglyBT support Swarm Merging by v2 hash, but Swarm Discoveries is other thing.
As far as I know biglybt Swarm Discoveries work by matching size of files, but even in this case it takes a lot of time (millions of torrents) to crawl DHT network.
To implement something like this clients would announce file hash list DHT, which would come up as a big load on network itself. Better option would be giving this load to trackers, but there's no standard for this yet, announcing something like: info_hash -> [file_hash1, file_hash2...]
would need another connection method, could be a http POST request.
Biggest question here is the trackers willing to take this load.
P.S.
Did you name your torrent "testing cross swarms"? :D
lol nope, I named it as a string of random letters.
After downloading for a while, although B didn't get anything from A, but some IPs from GE, FR, US, VN, and so on appeared in the peer list, and their client names are rather strange and usually not seen, e.g. the VN ip's client name is "VN 3.xxx", do you know what they are?
Nein