this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
56 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
5216 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hilliard@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

if firefox fails, that's the end of the fork I may or may not use. so I dont use a fork

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Firefox started as a fork of the Mozilla browser that was really good in its own right, got rid of bundled stuff people didn't want from the previous project, gathered user and developer support, and caught on. Why shouldn't a good fork of Firefox be able to do the same?

[–] WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox was an in-house fork of Mozilla.

Back then browsers were still quite simple. today they are probably the most complex piece of software running on your machine - including the OS.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

And the world supports many free and open source OSes, many of which have no present ties to or support by the people or organizations who started the things they were forked from.

I see no reason why the next big browser thing couldn't be a Firefox fork.

[–] WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Let’s hope so!

But the pessimist in me thinks nobody will do it again without craaaaazy investment behind them. Microsoft tried with edge and surrendered to chromium.

I seriously doubt that Apple and Google would succeed today.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

my attitude has been that firefox is bad, chrome is worse. our best bets right now are servo and a firefox fork. so i use a fork. i use a fork because i need a daily browser and servo isn't at all ready. the hope would be that firefox volunteers start working on the fork as they get fed up, and that the current maintainers of the fork continue gaining experience building a good browser as mozilla commits assisted suicide

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 hours ago

There is also Ladybird browser that IIRC already has a more complete web standards implementation than Servo despite being a much younger project. Though it's still far from being ready and performance is really bad. But so far it seems that it's going to outpace Servo.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 hours ago

LibreWolf, though zen seems really hopeful