this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
1498 points (99.2% liked)

pics

21445 readers
1013 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This looks so sick, I had to share it

Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/chavismarmol

Bluesky : @chavismarmol.bsky.social

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xye@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s an interesting take SatansMaggotyCumFart, but Kid Rock shooting a YETI isn’t the same energy as a real artist making art.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They’re both art even if you don’t agree with one of them.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You acknowledge it as art while at the same time ignoring the ability of art to shape public perception. Interesting.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is not what I said.

Conservatives burning Nikes shaped public perception too.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First, I don't think it did. Second, fire is good imagery for wanting something gone. This is much more evocative. And finally, I suspect those Nike-burning videos didn't start with used Nikes, because shoes wear out pretty fast. That means those supported Nike in their defiance as much as clowns shooting cases of Bud supported Anheuser-Busch in their defiance. While money for that Tesla certainly went to Musk, it's quite likely that none of the artists money for that Tesla went to him.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn’t matter if you just bought something or bought it ten years ago you’ve still given money to the company that made it.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Given the state of sales for Tesla, I think it's safe to say that's incorrect. No one else is buying that Tesla for it's intended purpose, and it's increasingly likely that the person he bought it from isn't buying another. This piece of art isn't supporting Tesla or driving their sales.

[–] xye@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We will just have to agree to all laugh at you for believing so I guess.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] xye@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago