this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
60 points (96.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5240 readers
722 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not per capita. The US, Canada, Australia, and Saudi Arabia are by far much much worse. Pretend each Chinese province is its own country if it makes you feel better. The earth doesn’t care about political boundaries.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Each of those provinces have the same federal Government that makes the rules.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes and those rules produce fewer emissions per capita than places like the US. Do you not understand what “per capita” means?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand that Saudi Arabia has higher per capita emissions than the US according to the Wikipedia article I linked to. But for some reason the pope is fixated on the west and the US.

[–] Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For some reason you're fixated on pretending it's not the west and US's problem too. Whataboutism is the refuge of the sycophant.