this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7286 readers
45 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] upstream@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering it costs $67 million just to launch a reusable falcon 9 they’d have to be 100% sure of the outcome to bet on such a thing.

If not you’re $100+ mill out and still have to replace a €420 million satellite..

[–] zhunk@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you're right that a dedicated Falcon launch would be needed for getting something like a Northrop's MEV out there, but if the spacecraft was "only" a smallsat with a few commercial arms on board, that might fit on a SpaceX rideshare for a lot less money.

[–] upstream@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Geostationary usually doesn’t have too many rides shares if I’m not mistaken. Cost is the launch, not the unused capacity.

[–] zhunk@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was picturing something boosting itself (or riding a tug) from a rideshare dropoff in LEO. The Transporter missions have all been to SSO, though, so that isn't super helpful.

[–] upstream@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Suppose that could be an option. Would need to be big, though, to have enough propellant to get to GEO.