this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38542 readers
339 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: https://archive.is/T2OfG

Somewhere in the northern US, drones fly over a 2,000-acre preserve, protected by a nine-foot fence built to zoo standards. It is off-limits to curious visitors, especially those with a passion for epic fantasies or mythical creatures.

The reason for such tight security? Inside the preserve roam three striking snow-white wolves—which a startup called Colossal Biosciences says are members of a species that went extinct 13,000 years ago, now reborn via biotechnology.

For several years now, the Texas-based company has been in the news for its plans to re-create woolly mammoths someday. But now it’s making a bold new claim—that it has actually “de-extincted” an animal called the dire wolf.

And that could be another reason for the high fences and secret location—to fend off scientific critics, some of whom have already been howling that the company is a “scam” perpetrating “elephantine fantasies” on the public and engaging in “pure hype.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Patch@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Species concepts are human classification systems, and everybody can disagree and everyone can be right,” she says. “You can use the phylogenetic [evolutionary relationships] species concept to determine what you’re going to call a species, which is what you are implying… We are using the morphological species concept and saying, if they look like this animal, then they are the animal.”

"If they look like this animal then they are the animal" really doesn't sound like a particularly useful (or scientifically rigorous) position.

Not least because there are lots of animals that look alike but aren't the same species.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

I have long arms and am kinda hairy.

People say I look like a chimp but I guess maybe I am a chimp

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this quote is sooo wrong on sooo many levels :(