this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
108 points (96.6% liked)

Games

18607 readers
467 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As opposed to what?

Portable optical media was almost-sorta-kinda a good idea, when flash media offered dozens of megabytes. (And even then, should've used a mouse sensor and software tracking instead of a laser assembly.) Download-only would (1) increase costs of a system that was frankly overpriced even before The Idiot's economy-tanking tantrums and (2) require Nintendo's online infrastructure to lurch forward by about fifteen years.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As opposed to what?

As opposed to what literally everyone else is doing?

Download-only would (1) increase costs of a system

What? If anything it would decrease it because there's no slot needed for the media.

require Nintendo's online infrastructure to lurch forward by about fifteen years.

I don't see how that's a bad thing.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you priced SSDs, relative to... slots?

I don’t see how that’s a bad thing.

Bad, no. Hard, yes.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It...already has an SSD? Have you contemplated the costs of slot + game cards + shipping + third-party sales fees vs. SSD?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It has an SSD sized on the assumption that games go in the slot. It has an SSD that's the price of a game, and will only hold a dozen. And they could probably get away with less, thanks to focusing on the negligible cost of a hole and some pins.

Nintendo is only now figuring out that Virtual Console purchases should be transferable... at all. They are not qualified to handle a digital-only console. I think the idea of deleting a game and re-downloading it, for free, was a recent surprise to some of these people. The same way Sony's still trying to repeat the PS2, Nintendo's been trying to repeat the Famicom Disk System.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you contemplated the costs of slot + game cards vs. SSD?

They are not qualified to handle a digital-only console

I mean they're one of the most profitable companies in the business. There's no reason they couldn't become qualified...

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They could.

They haven't.

They won't.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well I never tried to speculate what they were going to do...

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Commenting on what they're doing right now is not meaningfully different. This started with you second-guessing their commitment to cartridges.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're mistaken. My statement was simply that it was wild that they were still doing it.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Distinction without difference.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My guy, if remarking that it's "crazy" isn't commentary on whether it makes sense, what is it?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My guy, commenting on what makes sense is not the same thing as speculating about what they're going to do or second guessing their commitment to cartridges.

Anything else you'd like to make up?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My apologies for remembering the words you wrote.

If you don't like speculation, don't say things like "there’s no reason they couldn’t become qualified." Because that, in itself, is speculation. As surely as calling this situation "crazy" is commentary on whether it makes sense.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because that, in itself, is speculation.

🤣 No it's not.

Have a nice night.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

"They can" isn't, but "they can't" is.

Sure dude.