this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
46 points (97.9% liked)

Linux

6955 readers
940 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is the loss of pacman and AUR that bad?

What things are to be gained? I expect that SELinux and Redhat backing should really make fedora way more secure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've been told OpenSUSE software availability is very, very limited compared to Fedora's. What do you think about it?

[–] thirtyfold8625@thebrainbin.org 1 points 14 hours ago

The only program I wanted to use but haven't managed to access using the openSUSE package management system is one that's unlikely to be available using Fedora's either.

When there is a package provided by the original creator of a program, it's less likely that openSUSE compatibility will be tested, and it's probably more likely that compatibility will not be tested as rigorously. In my experience, a package intended for use with Fedora will be useful to use with openSUSE without needing to modify it most of the time (the names of basic dependencies/capabilities are probably the same for both operating systems in many cases). I think coverage is expanding over time, since the examples I thought only explicitly supported Fedora currently do support OpenSUSE too: https://brave.com/linux/ https://vscodium.com/#install-on-fedora-rhel-centos-rockylinux-opensuse-rpm-package

I don't like the idea of using Flathub, but most programs that aren't accessible while only using YaST are available using GNOME Software, and it might be true that the exact same set of programs is accessible using that method while using either Fedora or openSUSE.

Wherever you end up, if you're willing to use Flatpaks, you'll have many up-to-date options.