this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
512 points (91.6% liked)

Flippanarchy

944 readers
1454 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

You think the 90M people that couldn’t be bothered to vote against fascism are going to take to the streets and fight?

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 18 hours ago

It doesn't take 90M people to blow up a pipeline.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Electoral voting is useless and built to disenfranchise and demotivate people participating from politics. Doing direct action immediately improves your life and builds mutual aid networks. So yes.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It’s useless, yet it’s exactly why we have a fascist dictator? That’s tautological.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

You would get a fascist dictator regardless. That has always been the inevitable path of liberal electoral politics under capitalism.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Ah, defeatism. It’s going to happen anyway, so why bother doing anything about it. Great outlook.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They stated a fact, that not defeatism. WTF is with people getting mad at the messenger all the time

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The message that voting would’ve done nothing to stop Trump from being elected is nonsensical.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They always attack as soon as they get lost. Instead of asking questions and perhaps learning new opinions it's much easier to just call names.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

It’s quite tragic too, I would hate to deny myself knowledge just to satisfy my ego. We’d be in a much better place if people wouldn’t double down and would just learn from the experience

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 26 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't saying do nothing, they're saying do something more useful than voting.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And I’m saying not voting is how we got fascism. There were 13M more people that did nothing, than all 77M people who voted for Trump. I don’t expect them to fight unless personally attacked.

That leaves the ~78M people that collectively voted against Trump. Then remove the sick, disabled, elderly, government, military, and police. We’re not getting anywhere with force unless we can engage the 90M people who couldn’t be inconvenienced to put pen to paper to stop fascism.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh, are you under the impression that there's a group of liberals (as in liberalism in general) out there that doesn't coddle and appease and enable fascism that I could vote for? Because Democrats are putting up the most token of resistance at best, and meanwhile voting in support of the right's shenanigans in congress. Schumer voted for the budget, 4 others voted just the other day for a bill that would effectively disenfranchise millions of women, etc.

If you walk into a voting booth and find someone holding a bomb who insists that your only choice for how to deal with it is to choose between a long fuse or a short one, the only sane thing to do is to say 'Good luck with that' and leave before you get caught in the blast radius. I voted blue for 30 years and it didn't get me less fascism, why do you imagine it would suddenly start working today? The fascism is coming from inside the house.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 0 points 14 hours ago

Why don't you run yourself?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’m saying that Harris was not a fascist dictator. Simple as.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

No, she probably wouldn't have been. But hey, if you're comfortable cuddling up with that bomb because it has a longer fuse then by all means don't let me stop you, just don't act all surprised when it inevitably blows up anyway.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't put words in my mouth. I suggest the opposite of "doing nothing". Voting is doing nothing every 4 years and expecting things to improve in the face of 100 years of evidence to the contrary.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I insist that you’re incorrect, based on the simple fact that 77M people voted for a fascist dictator and now we have a fascist dictator. Clearly voting does something, or we wouldn’t have a fascist dictator for president.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Kinda ignores the reality that the past 3 election cycles have been fascist vs. a party that positions itself as progressive "not fascists." You'd think that, you know. The "not fascists" would've done something to prevent the fascists from gaining power.

Instead, they endorsed international colonialism and genocide and spent 4 years fighting back against workers' rights.

Electoral liberalism trends towards the right over time. As a rule. Because capitalist interests are always further to the right, and electoral liberalism is based on capitalism and the existence of a capitalist ruling class. Any ideology that permits the existence of capitalism must include very strong limits on capitalist enterprise and absolute bans on capital political power and influence. Or, by default, it becomes more fascist over time. Anti-capitalism is the only ideology congruent with antifascism.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 21 hours ago

Yes, electoral politics inevitably and eventually "does" fascism.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Can you point to a single US election where the half the country that never votes magically showed up to vote?

If not maybe don't rely on a group of people that will never participate.