this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
134 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59295 readers
4490 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

China shares ambitious plans to double its space station as the ISS approaches the end of its life cycle::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't really understand how the entire ISS could be "end of life cycle." Aren't there a bunch of different modules of different ages? And anyway, the oldest modules are 24 years old that is nothing with proper maintenance, there are 50 year old trains still in operation daily.

[–] Beardsley@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Space trains fall under a different regulating authority than space stations, unfortunately.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If a train fails, at worst that will happen is it will stop. When a space station fails, the worst that will happen is everyone inside dies.

In addition, a space station is far more expensive, and it may be simply too expensive to still maintain old technology. Ideally, at some point, one will replace it with a newer, more modern, space station. Which will both be cheaper, and allow more, novel, science to be done. Although I don't know if there is any plan for that.

I'd like to see a space station with a rotating ring, that generates artificial gravity through centrifugal acceleration.

[–] TotalTrash@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 year ago

Lol that's nowhere near the worst scenario for a train failure.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know why can't they just send it to a Lagrange point and leave it there. Burning it seems like literally burning money.