this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
256 points (95.4% liked)

Steam Deck

14862 readers
221 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

Not the person you replied to, but I have a Steam Controller and a streaming device for my main library on my desktop, so I'm honestly torn.

What do you think makes this better than such a setup? From my perspective, it seems like the main benefit is "Steam Controller with screen attached," so it's portable, and it has some limited* capabilities to install and play games locally.

I'm not trying to detract, but having used my own setup for over five years, I wonder what it is I might be missing. What do you think?

Edit: *Compared to a desktop with latest-gen or second-latest-gen hardware.

[–] narwhalperson@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Limited capabilities? I haven’t found a game in my library it couldn’t play locally. The ui is great, the controls work well, and it can even be used to run desktop apps.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I should have qualified: *Limited compared to latest-gen desktop hardware.

Because let's be honest, no amount of tweaking will get you to that same level. But it's obviously enjoyable and more than "just playable," else we'd hear about it from a lot more people. My question was more geared towards "what is it that I'm missing out on" compared to what I have, not to passive aggressively wrinkle my nose at the console.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you're comparing a $400 portable to a $3k 1000 watt desktop?

Yeah, if you have that desktop and a steam controller, that's going to play better at home. If you want to play portably, or anywhere in your house like in bed next to your wife, the deck is excellent. You could even stream locally from you PC to the deck while laying in bed.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

$3k 1000 watt desktop

Mine is only 450-500 at most, and about half that cost (towards when GPUs began to come down). But I was just trying to ascertain how it compares to a gaming rig from current or a generation ago. If it can emulate and do 2D like a champ but struggles with 3D, that would factor into my decision. I don't mind lowering settings, but I do if they always have to be "Low." I did my time on a GTX 960M—not doing that again, insomuch as it's up to me.

But from the other answers, it sounds like it is both capable and has some unique use cases that my SFF desktop couldn't fill. With the community support and ever-growing list of tweaks and tools, I think it might be on my shortlist for the next sale.

load more comments (11 replies)