this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
531 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] isles@lemmy.world 142 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The picture explains itself. The cable exists in a 4-dimensional space.

[–] tetris11@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reply is pretty self-explanatory too. The cable exists in a 4-dimensional space.

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

You guys joke about this, but he managed to create a connector with three sides: up, down, and "oh yeah the first side was the correct one"

[–] rasensprenger@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"In geometry and physics, spinors /spɪnər/ are elements of a complex number-based vector space that can be associated with Euclidean space.[b] A spinor transforms linearly when the Euclidean space is subjected to a slight (infinitesimal) rotation,[c] but unlike geometric vectors and tensors, a spinor transforms to its negative when the space rotates through 360° (see picture). It takes a rotation of 720° for a spinor to go back to its original state. This property characterizes spinors: spinors can be viewed as the "square roots" of vectors (although this is inaccurate and may be misleading; they are better viewed as "square roots" of sections of vector bundles – in the case of the exterior algebra bundle of the cotangent bundle, they thus become "square roots" of differential forms)."


Seems pretty self-explanatory to me! /s

[–] Tosti@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Purged by creator