Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
view the rest of the comments
I call BS on this particular experiment. I just don't trust that they did it right.
Those $2 gas station lasers shoot faint light out in a large cone. What I mean is, look at the barrel of one of those lasers when it's on. (Don't aim it at your eye, obv.) There is almost a 180° range where you can see red light at the tip of the laser.
He's holding the laser directly above the mirror at a 45° angle, so some of that scattered light will be hitting the mirror. Just because the camera can't see the laser's tip in the mirror doesn't mean it's not visible from the mirror's perspective. There's an enormous amount of parallax between the two perspectives. It's so stupid that he looks at the camera's view and says, "You cannot see the laser light at all, right?", and doesn't realize it's because of parallax! 🤦
Meanwhile, even we the viewers can see laser light in our camera when it's not aimed even remotely toward us. Look:
So this diffuse light is hitting the mirror and film, and because it's a diffraction grating, some of it is redirected to the camera.
Do I doubt that there are bizarre physics that can happen in proper experiments like this? No. I don't doubt people like Feynman. I just think this experiment is bullshit. Much like the entire channel.
The rest of this comment is just a rant. You should probably stop reading.
I can't stand that guy's absolutely fake reaction. There's no way he didn't do this experiment a few other times in front of the camera, and he's just making this over-the-top, fake, hysterical, "WHAT!? OH MY GOD, NO WAY!" Over and over. Ugh.
Speaking of fake. Why is the video call on this laptop screen edited in? It jumped right out at me as soon as I saw it.
The top and bottom edges of the video aren't parallel to the screen, and there's no glare. The bottom edge is the worst:
Why would he fake this? It's a one-second clip. It's not even important. I guess he needed more B roll of himself looking thoughtful and nodding.
I hate Veritasium ever since that incredibly dumb video about the "speed of electricity" where he made electricity sound all mystical and magical, and didn't once use the word "induction", and basically lied about everything. It was so bad that a dozen other science YouTubers had to make reaction videos explaining how wrong he was. Like Alpha Phoenix.
Veritasium is overproduced garbage masquerading as science.