this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38572 readers
336 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jBoi@szmer.info 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I would draw the line at having an algorithmic content feed as the primary way of interaction. TikTok, Instagram, Facebook (mostly), YouTube, Twitter, Reddit would be out or would have to drastically change their content discovery system. By algorithmic I mean - one that adapts to the user's personal viewing habits.

I'd classify stuff like IRC and web forums as communicators, in the same basket as WhatsApp, email, sms, and perhaps Discord. I agree that they have, in general, valuable social interactions. They also don't have the same effect as algorithmic platforms where you can be scrolling for 2 hours and not remember a single thing you read, or where you're served content tailored to keep you engaged.

I'm sure there are some valuable platforms that would get hurt by this distinction, but imo it's a good first guideline.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's a possible distinction to make, the main problem is that the article in the OP didn't make that distinction.

[–] jBoi@szmer.info 1 points 5 hours ago

You're right, I guess I just assumed the author had the same view as me.