this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
531 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
3524 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
531
USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed to be reversible (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 year ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
232 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So micro and mini usb are superior!

[–] rDrDr@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mini is fine. Micro is very close to being symmetrical that it might as well be. For cables that small, reversible is the way to go.

[–] naticus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My biggest problem with those was that mini didn't have a strong enough friction fit and would become loose easily, and micro would wear down and break so easily. Luckily it seems that USB C has all the right qualities. It's symmetrical but reversible, it's durable, it clicks into place well, and it's form works well on desktop, laptop, and mobile equally.