this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
110 points (99.1% liked)

Europe

5787 readers
1026 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived

Here is the original study: Restrict Remote Access of PV Inverters from High-Risk Vendors

The European Solar Manufacturing Council (ESMC) has issued a stark warning, highlighting a critical threat to Europe’s energy autonomy stemming from the unregulated remote access capabilities of PV inverters produced by non-European, high-risk manufacturers—particularly those from China. A recent study by DNV substantiates these concerns.

As solar power becomes increasingly integral to Europe’s clean energy goals and energy security, a major vulnerability looms: software-enabled remote access to PV inverters—the essential control units of solar power systems.

[...]

The threat is real, not hypothetical. Internet connectivity is essential for modern inverters to perform grid support functions and participate in power markets. However, this connectivity also enables remote software updates, allowing manufacturers to potentially modify device performance from afar. This poses serious cybersecurity risks, including the danger of intentional disruption or large-scale shutdowns. A recent DNV report, commissioned by SolarPower Europe, highlights the credible risk of cascading blackouts due to coordinated or malicious manipulation of inverters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only whataboutism is coming from your comment.

  1. I was not saying that we should just let China do its thing. I was saying that instead of just focusing on China, we should be banning the companies which have are by law obligated to provide backdoors too.
  2. the US is a fashist state, and if you somehow really think its not threat enough that trump is arresting children and sentencing them without lawyers, as well as sending immigrants to KZs, you should really see a doctor.
[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

to point number 2, China is also a fascist state. your meme is whataboutism because it's implying we should leave China alone while at the same time China is committing the same abuses that the US does. I'm a FOSS advocate in software and hardware, most Chinese tech doesn't meet the standards of respecting human rights

[–] Spectrism@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

it's implying we should leave China alone

It just implies that we should treat the US and Chinese more similarly. Whether this means avoiding the US more or working more closely with China is completely up to interpretation.

most Chinese tech doesn't meet the standards of respecting human rights

Is that a problem with Chinese tech, or just proprietary tech? Because apart from privacy, I can't tell which human rights tech is supposed to respect, and lack of privacy is an issue not limited to Chinese tech.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

FOSS is certainly easier to audit, though there's still a risk of malicious contributors introducing backdoors or other exploits.

And just to be clear, there are groups within China who are relentlessly executing cyber-attacks against European and US assets. China's not the only source, but it's the biggest (at least based on what we're seeing at my workplace, which includes a high-volume website). And nothing happens in China for long without the CCP's approval. So, at least de facto, assume that's in line with Chinese government policy.

The best course of action is to never assume any third party is going to protect your data unless someone credible has independently confirmed it. Don't buy internet-connected devices unless there's a damned good reason for them to be connected, and even then, firewall the hell out of them and make sure there's no path from such a device to your sensitive data. If you have a home LAN for your various connected devices, keep that stuff logically (and ideally physically) separate from your personal data.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is that a problem with Chinese tech, or just proprietary tech? Because apart from privacy, I can't tell which human rights tech is supposed to respect

not using Uyghur slave labor in East Turkestan would be a bare minimum for example. I'm not implying that China is alone in this, it's a problem in all the other capitalist countries.

even if they made their tech open source, I highly doubt they'd stop exploiting the populace

[–] Spectrism@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you're talking about the tech industry, not the tech itself.

Assuming that the "Uyghur forced labor" claim isn't just American propaganda: Do you really think forced labor is used for the tech industry? Skilled workers, who are needed for the tech industry, are a bit harder to exploit and it seems like the main concern with forced labor of Uyghurs is cotton. To my knowledge, the whole tech industry is located mostly in eastern China.

And how do you know that "most of Chinese tech doesn't respect human rights", when referring to forced labor? Do you track down the production chain of Chinese products? Or was there some investigation that I missed? These seem like absurd claims to me, so I'd really like a few sources.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Spectrism@feddit.org 0 points 2 days ago

I'm a genocide denier in the sense that I see what may be happening in Xinjiang as a violation of human rights, not a genocide just yet. But your second link seems convincing enough for me to read more about, thanks.

The issues in the Congo are true. I didn't think about them before because I consider them mostly a failure of the Congo to enforce labor laws, but obviously Chinese companies aren't innocent here.