this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
110 points (99.1% liked)

Europe

5787 readers
1026 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived

Here is the original study: Restrict Remote Access of PV Inverters from High-Risk Vendors

The European Solar Manufacturing Council (ESMC) has issued a stark warning, highlighting a critical threat to Europe’s energy autonomy stemming from the unregulated remote access capabilities of PV inverters produced by non-European, high-risk manufacturers—particularly those from China. A recent study by DNV substantiates these concerns.

As solar power becomes increasingly integral to Europe’s clean energy goals and energy security, a major vulnerability looms: software-enabled remote access to PV inverters—the essential control units of solar power systems.

[...]

The threat is real, not hypothetical. Internet connectivity is essential for modern inverters to perform grid support functions and participate in power markets. However, this connectivity also enables remote software updates, allowing manufacturers to potentially modify device performance from afar. This poses serious cybersecurity risks, including the danger of intentional disruption or large-scale shutdowns. A recent DNV report, commissioned by SolarPower Europe, highlights the credible risk of cascading blackouts due to coordinated or malicious manipulation of inverters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What's this US backdoor story?

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

It's bullshit. But elements within the EU have been relentlessly pushing for backdoors for at least a decade, and the UK and the Australians have tried it on as well.

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The US cloud act and the US Patriot Act

Especially with just about every comsumer electronic regularly sending all your data to their servers, these laws are nothing but a backdoor with extra steps.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The CLOUD Act is to allow data stored outside the US by US-based cloud providers to be accessed by selected foreign countries that have issued subpoenas and have requested US government assistance. It's not a backdoor per se, and anyone with any sense encrypts their data before uploading it to the cloud instead of relying on cloud provider encryption services. Even if the US government weren't snooping, there's the risk that a cloud provider could be compromised by other hostile actors. Though it's not all that wise to assume that cloud providers' encryption services don't have backdoors, unless that's been confirmed by an impartial third-party audit. I know of no such audits.

The PATRIOT Act is a human-rights nightmare for many reasons, but doesn't grant the US government anti-privacy powers that the CLOUD Act doesn't. It's just more vaguely worded.

And if you really want some worse Kafkaeque misery, FISA warrants will give you plenty if your or your firm's name is on one.

[–] EuroMod@feddit.org 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The CLOUD Act and Patriot Act contradicting GDPR is the reason why the EU needed the various Privacy Shields to give some legal basis for declaring data transfers to the US legal.

And no, most people don't encrypt their data before uploading to US cloud providers. That's the issue.

/f

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah ok. Thanks for clearing that up, I thought I missed something else. Yeah that's pretty bad and it's mind blowing how nobody cares in Europe and every new PC/Laptop is sold with Windoz and every big Company has all its assets in Micråsoft infrastructures...