Futurology

0 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

voidx@futurology.today

Lugh@futurology.today

wahming@monyet.cc

Espiritdescali@futurology.today

Artificial General Intelligence is already here say leading AI researchers Blaise Agüera y Arcas and Peter Norvig (www.noemamag.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] IzzyData@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't believe that without some extremely substantial evidence.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly, if they could essentially "remove" the limited context window, I would be tempted to call it AGI. Not perfect by any stretch, but good enough to pass my personal Turing Test.

[–] andyburke@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So far, these things are clearly statistics with extra steps. Like you, I need to see some serious evidence before I would begin to believe this in the slightest.

[–] IzzyData@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I think I'd be more easily convinced that humans are just statistics with extra steps than machine learning / language models such as ChatGPT are sentient.