this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
119 points (97.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
479 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
119
How oil companies put the responsibility for climate change on consumers (theconversation.com)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, fine. We'll likely need oil for lubrication for a long time, but my next car will be electric, and we're getting solar over this and the next year. They'll lose my contributions to their coffers, because fuck them.

They should be held accountable, but I'm not going to hem and haw waiting for them to do the right thing (or for the governments to get off their collective assess and do something about it).

[–] projectd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly, good for you. As individuals, we can choose to make things better, be a part of the solution, and have a big collective impact by making changes.

Bonus points are that it sends a signal to others which amplifies the impact, and also reduces the power of those large organisations who do bad, since our better actions often feed them less money.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have vegetable oil for example and algaes can produce oil as well. So we do not need to dig for fossil fuel, there are alternatives for lubriaction and similar problems, were oil is very much needed.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Im not certain how well plant based alternatives work for the specific formulations needed for most lubricants, but honestly given the scale involved it doesn’t really matter if we use ground reserves. Most machines use gallons a year or decade, not per five minutes like cars.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, it's the mechanical properties of non-crude lubricants that's the issue. Maybe scientists could find a way to turn vegetable oil into industrial grease, but I have no idea if that's even possible.

But like you say, lubricants aren't the main problem; it has always been fossil fuels.