this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
4 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Similar-West5208@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Bellingham's skills & ambitions just outgrew our squad at a pace we kind of could predict but didn't want to.

I don't think he was a real dickhead tbh.

[–] simonutd99@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

He just exposed the ceiling of your club

[–] Similar-West5208@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It sounds kind of rude but it's the truth and realising the ceiling is the first step to push beyond it.

I'm not entirely sure if the club wants to realise this too though, the last transfer window was far from convincing.

Feels more like settling to me but it can be kind of disheartening when it happens every other season.

Like how do you make the Ruhrpott attractive to star players when they dont 100% identify with the mentality and the people there knowing that you can pay well but you cant pay Man City/Real Madrid well, knowing you're able to compete for most titles but chances of winning are a different story?

On top of that individual ambitions will always be better realised at the behemoth clubs like chance for ballon d'or, individual sponsoring and contracts etc

Then there is the lifestyle and glamour factor too which you also cant ignore, especially when there is partners or family involved.

[–] simonutd99@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it’s quite a difficult situation for Dortmund. Winning last year or anything in general and regularly would help tremendously. The Ruhr Region is a big push factor for players as well. Paying higher wages is untenable and could mean financial suicide so I understand Watzke and co. A real golden generation of homegrown talent seems like the most probable push for Dortmund imo

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)