politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I read about it in a news article. I think it was an interview with the head of ICE on Meet the Press.
And you just believe the news when you're in fucking Nazi Germany?
Oh wow, so you have no source other than “maybe the head of ICE said it.”
I’m sure the mother wanted her child with stage 4 cancer to not have medicine or access to his doctor, that makes so much sense.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/deported-us-citizen-girl-brain-tumor-seeks-return-rcna205607
In the article the parents are talking about having to choose if they should leave their US citizen children here or take them with them.
Did you even read the article you shared?
No you claimed they were deporting American citizens. That was your claim and that claim is untrue.
Hey broseph - looks like we are struggling with some reading comprehension here - care to look at the title of the article you just shared? I’ll add italics for emphasis to help you find the key words.
Hey, let’s take a look at the second paragraph too:
So it appears that either you are illiterate, or lying, based on the source that you shared.
The internet is so overrated. Yes the children were sent with the parents, AT THE PARENTS REQUEST, back to the parents home country. AT THE PARENTS REQUEST. If you read the whole article the parents were presented with 3 choices: 1. Leave the children with a relative 2. Leave the children who would go "into the system" 3. Take them with you. Bruh.
That’s literally not what the article says.
Please keep demonstrating your cognitive dissonance - this is a fascinating case study. You’ve repeatedly made incorrect claims, switched back and force between them, and provided my evidence.
Feel free to waste your time gargling the cum of stinky Mussolini though.
Idk what all these gay innuendos have to do with this? Just read the article. The parents talk about having to decide if they are going to take the children with them. Just read the article.
I imagine you are very young and I'll assume you are in America. As a really young person how do you see America? Do you think there is still opportunity available for you? Do you have a plan or goals? Have thought about and a plan to achieve them?
Ok.
“The narrative that DHS is deporting American children is false and irresponsible reporting,” adding that immigration authorities ask mothers if they wish to be removed with their children or if they want the children to be placed in the safe custody of someone the parent designates.
I went and pulled words out for you since you cant read the whole 2min article little buddy.
Yes, there was an interview on Meet The Press where the head of ICE was pressed on this exact issue. Maybe you should go watch it.
Well, googling “ICE” and “Meet the Press” provides several different videos on several different topics. Usually, when we have sources for claims, we provide them as a link. If you need help figuring out how to do so, you use two brackets like this [text you want shows up here] and than follow that with (https://your/ link)
I’m also unsure on how the director of ICE would know that this woman wanted her child to not have access to their cancer treatment, since the entire point was that due process was not followed and they literally put them on a plane before a court could tell them no.
But if you are okay with deporting US citizens, you’ve made a decision on what side of history you are going to be on.