this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
275 points (98.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5057 readers
323 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Miclux@lemmings.world 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

They really argue about birds?! Not insects? Flowers? Plants? Bees?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's a standard troll argument, yeah.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 8 points 11 months ago

There are "grassroots" movements claiming significant environmental damage from converting farmland to solar farms. Seriously.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

Over here, there have been groups who put dead birds (often roadkill) underneath wind turbines.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

I think it's because they can see the birds that turbines kill. The birds killed the the pollution fossil fuels cause are hard to notice and especially hard to link to the cause of death. When there's dead birds around a turbine, it's more obvious.

People don't look at numbers. They're driven by emotions, which favour what they can easily see and wrap their heads around. Or alternatively, what they are most scared of. Eg, nuclear power is far safer and less radioactive than coal. But that doesn't matter. People are afraid of nuclear because of past incidents they heard about. The way coal kills people is so much harder to notice than a dramatic HBO series.