Specifically, (as a native English speaker) my gut is to do the same thing (participle vs. past-simple) with irregular verbs such as this (others being dealt, learnt, spelt, etc.).

I couldn't sworn I read something about that usage when I was a teenager but everything I look up regarding them, now, chalks them up to being just an EN-US and EN-GB difference but, otherwise, entirely equivalent.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a strange idiolect. "Dealt" seems correct, but "learnt" and "spelt" do not. Neither would lead me to raise an eyebrow; I'd assume I'm interacting with a user of British English.

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 1 points 5 days ago

To be fair (according to everything I've been able to find), you ought to be as, apparently, they're more favored, over there. I dunno; I do suspect I picked it up from reading and The Wind in the Willows and The Once and Future King were favorites of mine, in childhood, so maybe that's it.