Dungeons and Dragons

12059 readers

1 users here now

A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!

/c/DnD Network Communities

Other DnD and related Communities to follow*

DnD/RPG Podcasts

*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans

Rules (Subject to Change)

Be a Decent Human Being
Credit OC content (self or otherwise)
Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article

Format: [Source Name] Article Title

Posts must have something to do with Dungeons and Dragons
No Piracy, this includes links to torrent sites, hosted content, streaming content, etc. Please see this post for details
Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
No NSFW content
Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world

owenfromcanada@lemmy.world

Do rogues start with 5 languages now? (feddit.it)

submitted 4 days ago by 20nat@feddit.it to c/dnd@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In dnd 2024 every character knows common and 2 standard languages.

A rogue ability grants to the rogue the knowledge of the "thieves' cant" and allows to select a language from the rare languages table.

I don't understand if these 2 new rare language add to the first 3, making every rogue start with at least 5 languages, or if you just replace the two standard languages with "thieves' cant" and another rare language.

Any suggestion on the proper rule interpretation? Also I have similar questions for druid and ranger abilities that grant new languages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 20nat@feddit.it 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Now I'm convinced that this is the proper interpretation, I think I will stick to the rule in my games but it still feels wrong for two main reasons:

I've never considered rogue or ranger a language heavy class, for me a wizard that knows 5 languages makes much more sense.
Apperently, according to the rules, there are 0 persons on the entire planet that know only 2 languages, even the stupidest barbarian out there has to know perfectly at least 3 languages.

What do you think?

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I think it depends on your interpretation of "language" in 5E. I could see someone interpreting common and under-common being as similar as English and British English

Rangers and Rogues are two classes that are generally interpreted as being better traveled which I would say is the argument for having that many languages. PCs are also very different from NPCs, any character that you play is already exceptional, so having more money, more skills, more languages is to be expected. Also, it's not entirely unrealistic, there's tons of bilingual/trilingual people in the real world, I bet you know words and phrases in multiple languages. I know you're already fluent in English

Although, I don't know if this is RAW or commonly accepted home brew but generally anything under 3 INT isn't considered capable of understanding language and if you roll a character that dumb I'd argue they shouldn't be capable of speech