Linux

48245 readers

586 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Any real benefit to enabling Multi-Gen LRU? (lemdro.id)

submitted 1 year ago by mfat@lemdro.id to c/linux@lemmy.ml

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In case you don't know Multi-Gen LRU is an alternative LRU implementation that optimizes page reclaim and improves performance under memory pressure. Page reclaim decides the kernel's caching policy and ability to overcommit memory. It directly impacts the kswapd CPU usage and RAM efficiency.

Has anyone enabled this feature on their machines? Have you noticed any performance gains or memory management improvements? It's developed by Google and is reportedly is being used in ChromeOS and Android.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] trachemys@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don’t even use swap anymore. 32gb of ram ought to be enough.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I still keep some swap around on the off chance something eats up a shit ton of memory. Dealing with the OOM killer is always a bad time.

If you don't want to use disk swap there's always zram, it'll consume like ~4GB RAM for ~12GB active swap if you use zstd with it. It won't allocate any (meaningful amount of) compressed memory if swap isn't active so there's not much of a downside here.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know the feeling. I have a “desktop” that has 640GB of memory. Now I say “desktop” because while it IS desktop I mainly use it for a nested virtualization lab.

Of course creating a 500gb RAM disk for some ungodly fast file manipulation is not something I’ve ever thought about or done. /s.

In case you’re wondering it’s an Intel MacPro that just happened to be compatible with the memory in a retired production blade … so yay!

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I jammed 64GB into my work laptop sort of by accident (I thought the original kit I ordered was 2x16GB but it was 1x32 so why not keep going) and I have no regrets. 20GB tmpfs for builds? Why not?

[–] 30021190@lemmy.cloud.aboutcher.co.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Wait until 32GB RAM isn't enough and the OOM decides to randomly kill processes. Especially with memory leaks...

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I especially love disabling swap on windows, sometimes it gets weird