Selfhosted

61103 readers

754 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

I'm using compose wrong and I know it. (lemmy.one)

submitted 2 years ago by BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For the last two years, I've been treating compose files as individual runners for individual programs.

Then I brainstormed the concept of having one singular docker-compose file that writes out every single running container on my system... (that can use compose), each install starts at the same root directory and volumes branch out from there.

Then I find out, this is how most people use compose. One compose file, with volumes and directories branching out from wherever ./ is called.

THEN I FIND OUT... that most people that discover this move their installations to podman because compose works on different versions per app and calling those versions breaks the concept of having one singular docker-compose.yml file and podman doesn't need a version for compose files.

Is there some meta for the best way to handle these apps collectively?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] null@slrpnk.net 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think compose is best used somewhere in between.

I like to have separate compose files for all my service "stacks". Sometimes that's a frontend, backend, and database. Other times it's just a single container.

It's all about how you want to organize things.

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 27 points 2 years ago

I do this, 1 compose file per application. That has all the things that application need, volumes, networks, secrets.

In single docker host land, each application even has its own folder with the compose file and any other artifacts in it.

[–] fraydabson@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah this post had me a little worried I’m doing something wrong haha. But I do it just like that. Compose file per stack.