this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
93 points (93.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

41163 readers
1395 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Disclaimer: I use a password manager, so please don't direct your comments at me.


So I know this person that says they don't use a password manager because they have a better system like... I'm gonna give an example:

Lets say, a person loves Star Wars, and their favorite character is Yoda. The favorite Their favorite phrase is from The Good Place "This is the Bad Place!". And their favorite date is 1969 July 20th (first landing on moon).

So here:

Star Wars Yoda = SWYd

"This is the Bad Place!" = ThIThBaPl!

1969 July 20 ---> 69 07 20

So they have this "core" password = SWydThIThBaPl!690720

Then for each website, they add the website's first and last 2 characters of the name to the front of the password...

So, "Lemmy Forum" = leum

Add this to the beginning of the "core" password it becomes:

leumSWydThIThBaPl!690720

For Protomail Email it's: prilSWydThIThBaPl!690720

For Amazon Shopping it's: amngSWydThIThBaPl!690720

Get the idea?

The person says that, since the beginning of the password is unique, its "unhackable", and that the attacker would need like 3 samples of the password to figure out their system.

Is this person's "password system" actually secure?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That system is vulnerable to social engineering attacks. If hackers found out all their favourite things that lead to the core part of the password, guessing the prefix wouldn't be that hard. Also, what would your friend do if one of these passwords got compromised and had to change it? Would he just add a 1 to the site-specific part of the password?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Isn't every system vulnerable to social engineering hacks?

[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but there are degrees of vulnerability. Otherwise, things like password strength or MFA wouldn't matter.

If all your passwords are fully random, then that's one less weakness that can be exploited. People can't make educated guesses about your passwords just from analysing your social media profiles and history, e.g. if you post a lot about Star Wars, it's more likely your passwords could contain a Star Wars reference.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

... true. You were clearly talking about how the "root" was constructed. If the root were random, a weakness would still be inherent in having the root exposed means all your accounts are potentially compromised, but social engineering wouldn't be as much of an issue.

I skipped over the root generation, as it's just a useless twist on an older process. "Useless" in that I don't think it adds any value to construct a root from favorite things. It's no easier than just memorizing a single 12-character random string and then adding per-site suffixes, which is how I first heard this described a decade ago.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

guessing the prefix wouldn’t be that hard

Devil's Advocate: Most websites have limitations on the number of attempts.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Hackers aren’t always using the login interface, sometimes they’re beyond that and have access to the database of password hashes, and they’re trying to crack the password that can be entered to match a hash and get to try as many times as they like on their own away from the target system.