this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
731 points (86.7% liked)

Flippanarchy

1198 readers
28 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

So should I made it even?

No, if you're going to make a citation, make the citation relevant. In other words, just saying "Check my profile" doesn't work if checking your profile leads to the past several weeks of you bitching about liberals.

It helps that liberals are the only thing really able to fight Trump at the federal and local level. I’ve been told criticism is vaild. Here I am doing that.

But you aren't offering 'criticism' of liberals here, you're here poo-pooing electoralism and harm reduction as a whole and, bizarrely, downvoting people for questioning the veracity of a Lenin quote (a quote which turned out to be unsubstantiated, by the way).

Fuck, your response that kicked off this comment chain was in response to my comment about working with liberals, and despite your every other comment in this thread being scorn for working with liberals for being insufficiently pure, you regarded it as a 'strawman'.

EDIT: And, in the true spirit of criticizing someone for 'being unable to take criticism' by the horrid act of downvoting, it would seem you couldn't resist, yet again.

Projection all the way down.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Editing your comment like this is violating the spirit of the disengage rule.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I edited (or rather, checked Lemvote) as soon as I saw the downvote, which was before I saw the reply.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

Ok, fair enough..

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 days ago

Clearly we're not going to ever agree on this. Disengage, as per the instance/community rules.