this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
724 points (86.6% liked)

Flippanarchy

1176 readers
309 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

Yes, "inevitably." What the fuck do you think is going to happen when one side is "A declining status quo that we refuse to fix as it gets worse and worse," and the other is, "Let's see what's behind door #2! (hint: It's fascism!)"

Inevitably people will grow dissatisfied with the status quo, and look for any alternative. Inevitably. 100% chance. What part of that is so hard to understand?

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf -3 points 1 day ago (9 children)

So if "the status quo" inevitably leads to fascism, the only way to avoid fascism would be a society that is in constant change? Well, for one thing, every society is in constant change unless you install some kind of religious dogmatic dictatorship, and even those break after some time under the stress of sociological pressures.

Fascism, or things very much like it, happen whenever you let fear mongering powerhungry fools who deny reality in favor of some kind of nostalgia infused "greater" image of your society get away with their bullshit.

Human leadership leads to fascism at some point, because humans love their fears and their tribal behavior.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The liberal status quo inevitably leads to fascism. This shit doesn't happen in Cuba, Vietnam, or China because they dont let capitalism stop them from addressing societal problems.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well you could say they start with an authoritarian regime that doesn't do well with things like human rights to begin with if they don't go to fascism it's because they have a system that has, for a large part, most of the same downsides.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lmao talking about human rights when we have the highest prison population in the world. Have you ever felt like you had influence on the state's actions? The average cuban has, in their lifetime, been able to help write their own constitution, and then vote for it by referendum. The average Chinese feels their government represents their interests.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

We, do not. I'm not American. The US to me is an absurd place where wealth gets way too much power and respect.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)