this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
497 points (97.7% liked)

Linux Gaming

15335 readers
2 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
monolalia@lemmy.world
497
First time seeing Devs respond to a lack of anti-cheat support on Linux (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago by ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Link to the response: https://steamcommunity.com/id/takinalisa/recommended/1934780/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moody@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not all anti-cheats are kernel-level though, only the most invasive ones are. BattlEye, the one used in this game, is not one of them, though I don't know the specifics of how it works.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Sure, and I don't have issues with those, provided they are happy living in a sandbox. I think clientside anti-cheat is stupid for other reasons, but I won't actively avoid a game just because it has it, provided I can separate it from the rest of my system.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The important part is: Never Trust User Input!