Asklemmy

48758 readers

708 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

How level is "level" to the naked human eye? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 days ago by monovergent@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was putting up some wall decorations earlier today and was painstakingly realigning everything until it looked level to my eyes. It might be just a hair off, but if I don't correct it, I'll see the misalignment almost instantly and get bothered for the rest of time until I fix it. Has anyone investigated, or is there literature on the minimum perceptible angle from level to the naked eye?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But, oddly, it's not. How square it is with the walls is more important. Door and window frames, too, and those are more likely to be a touch off.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I was defining true level. Squaring with the room is inherently different, and absolutely more important for decor such as wall art. In contrast, hanging drapes to be level to a slanted ceiling can result in a loss of functionality.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago

You're right. Especially with the drapes: if the ceiling isn't level, it's a no-win situation. It's either going to look distracting, or function poorly.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah- Square and level are two different things. I can get a cube and rotate it any way, opposite faces will still be square to each other (technically parallel) despite not being level.

Interestingly, two perfectly vertical walls cannot be square to each other.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean re: the walls?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The Earth is curved.

At least, I assume that's what they meant.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh, you're one of those round-Earth nutjobs?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago

Ha! No, what whackjobs those people are. No, clearly the Earth is donut-shaped. This is obvious, because the Bible says so. The lizard people are suppressing the information, except on the internet. And talk radio. And tabloids.

Donut shaped!