this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
254 points (98.5% liked)
Greentext
6488 readers
866 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, even he's said that it was not a great choice lol.
I kinda get what he was going for though. It failed utterly, but as a scene meant to ground characters in their humanity and link them so deeply that the power of it could carry them through and into adulthood, the symbology is right.
The problem was their ages. Not because kids that age are never sexual, they can be. It was that the combination of the shock to the reader and the details of the scene pushed the idea into unrealistic territory that made it read unhinged rather than like an improvised magic ritual of sorts.
Like, c'mon man, you don't actually need to describe as much as you did. The concept of a young girl making that decision as her size first experience is already at the very edge of credibility, trying to make it seem beautiful and otherworldly just breaks the ragged remains of suspension of disbelief. Like, no Steve, no. Not even in that situation would that happen, it just isn't realistic even in that world. Fade to black, have it happen off screen, and be done with it if you really insist on that being the magic activity.
The fact that he didn't consider anything less skeevy is another issue, but damn, there were a dozen things that would have carried the symbolism just as much, or more. Why not become "blood brothers"? Everyone slice a hand and shake on it, you dig? You know, something that group of kids would actually think of in that situation. On a literary symbolism level it's better.
For one thing, the magic connection would be tied into all of them, not just hinging on one character. For another, blood exchanges as a form of power are damn near universal across the world's history and cultures.
I like King. The dude has a strange and engaging imagination. But that scene is the worst one he's ever written, on multiple levels.
I'm pretty sure Stephen King was sexually abused as a child, and I'm pretty sure this scene in It is just another example of him trying to work through it with his writing. It's a recurring theme in a lot of his work, and some of it feels like he's speaking from direct experience. The Library Policeman specifically. He also mentions in On Writing that he has sparse memories of his childhood with long blanks spots, which is pretty standard for traumatized kids.
I'm pretty sure the cocaine wrote that particular scene.
is it Kujo he has no memory of writing due to cocaine?
Or something lol. Dude had to be whacked out
Oh he absolutely was, throughout the 80s King was heavily cocaine and alcohol addicted.
Thank you. This confirms my sanity. Perfectly said. Love that book, deeply troubled over that scene. You've said everything I thought. Cheers.
I'd love to see the correspondence he had with his editor
I have to imagine it had the spirit of the Pepe Silvia incident
Beverley herself reacts with shocked horror when the memory returns, so some part of King knew it was farked up