this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

11382 readers
391 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Holy crap.

Is this basically Concord of 2025?

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

I don't think the issues with Concord had a single thing to do with the performance. That was basically the single way the game was fine.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I didn't play Concord, but from my experience of the first 2 or 3 hours is that starts as mostly a movie, you are just watching what is happening in the cutscene, you gotta pay attention cause it moves pretty fast through the story, occasionally killing, racing, minigame in-between the cutscenes.

You eventually get access to build mode that lets you build anything in the world, they have logic nodes for doing gameplay scripting and alot of assets to use, though I only played it with for a few minutes, it takes awhile to get to it in the story I think.

it looks like there's plans for a sort of UGC shared multiplayer type deal, but it's listed as single player so idk