this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
294 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

71843 readers
4505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Then you're a terrorist if you use the internet, period

Nearly all internet traffic if encrypted, and for plain browser traffic it's probably in the 95+%

You access your bank? Terrorist! Email? Terrorist! Lemmy? Terrorist!

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 1 points 10 hours ago

I dunno, I am not the French state. I can only see that they think the usage of signal is making you a terrorist.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Then you're also a terrorist if you use The Guardian 🤷‍♂️

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I dont' know, do you have sources about this ? Or are you imagining thing and deciding it is true ?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sources for what, exactly? What is "fantasming"? The title of the article you posted is "Criminalization of encryption". The Guardian is using encryption to send messages, so why would they be exempt? In fact, why would any internet use at all not be criminalized? It's all encrypted.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

So you read the title and you know everything. There is a liste of what they are accusing and their is no mention of internet

The elements of the investigation that have been communicated to us are staggering. Here are just some of the practices that are being misused as evidence of terrorist behavior6:

– the use of applications such as Signal, WhatsApp, Wire, Silence or ProtonMail to encrypt communications ;

– using Internet privacy tools such as VPN, Tor or Tails7 ;

– protecting ourselves against the exploitation of our personal data by GAFAM via services such as /e/OS, LineageOS, F-Droid ;

– encrypting digital media;

– organizing and participating in digital hygiene training sessions;

– simple possession of technical documentation.

But continue to invent reality. What are fact if not debatable point of view ? That the end for me. Have a great day.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago

I don't know everything. Just because it's not explicitly listed today doesn't mean it won't be tomorrow. This was just created yesterday. And it does the same thing that all of those listed apps do: facilitates private communication.