Lib.rs has previously been editorializing the crates within the search algorithm on their site based on their own personal preference. However, they recently have taken it a step too far in labeling the bitcoin repo as unmaintained despite active development taking place for the past several years. Several others have also taken similar actions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BitSound@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The crate in question, if anyone else is curious: https://lib.rs/crates/bitcoin

I couldn't find it by searching bitcoin, which makes me wonder if it's also deranked somehow

[–] Anders429@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the results don't include deprecated crates, so the deprecation mark effectively deranks it.

[–] aloso@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I searched "bitcoin", I found the bitcoin crate, but I had to scroll down a bit.

[–] Anders429@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, you're right. I see it as the 26th result, down below the "try searching with duckduckgo or on crates.io" notice.