this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
40 points (95.5% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
406 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In his seventh day in the chair, the new Speaker of the House of Commons sought to address MPs on the topic of decorum in the chamber. Much disorder followed.

Greg Fergus, who was elected Speaker earlier this month, advised MPs on October 4 that he would be coming forward with "reflective guidelines" to foster civility in the House. He chose Wednesday afternoon, immediately before question period, to do so.

But before Fergus could begin his remarks, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was on his feet, apparently expecting to ask the first question of question period.

After a few awkward seconds, Poilievre attempted to ask his question, prompting Fergus to stop him and state that the Conservative leader would be able to ask his question once the Speaker was done speaking. But Poilievre stayed on his feet, prompting Fergus to seek advice from one of the House of Commons procedural clerks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who gives a shit, it was either in poor taste or bad faith, either way not worth the time spent thinking about it

[–] Ryan213@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LOL OK, was just curious. How dare you tell me what to not think about! My brain, my choice.

[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sorry Ryan, the harshness in that comment was not really aimed at you there, just a general statement about the things he says, especially in this context. I understand the curiosity, but I'd rather not give him another platform to spew his manipulation from.

[–] Ryan213@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was expecting it to be something idiotic but on the off-chance that it wasn't, I was being curious.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

"A broken watch" and all, right?