Environment

3923 readers

28 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Zoos aren’t for animals. They’re for us. | Zoos say they’re leaders in protecting wildlife. But is it true? (www.vox.com)

submitted 1 year ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/environment@beehaw.org

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it's quite clear that people in the comments are not reading the article and reacting to the headline alone and maybe the first few paragraphs. Scroll to the end of the article where it starts taking about sanctuaries and funding and how they don't expect any of this to be an easy process

[–] Devi@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

What is your point here?

They claim to want sanctuaries, but don't seem to actually know what a sanctuary means. They're against captive breeding, which is the whole conservation bit that they claim to be for. They also want these to be closed, which means no money? It's just a really weird view from someone who has no understanding of conservation or reality.