this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
-69 points (17.8% liked)

Asklemmy

49427 readers
621 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's just a question don't get all up in my face this time. Personally I think Islam is underrated. They clearly take that shit more seriously than Whitoids take Christianity. Mexican Catholics or Shias who do we rank up top?

I'm going to be forwarding your responses to the Ayatollah so please take this seriously. Please don't be mean to me again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

To answer your question while ignoring your dishonesty, bias and ulterior motives:

I would be exactly the same level of annoyed. I have a distrust for any government especially when they play war or when they threaten others.

That said, some governments have proven to be more straightforward and predictable than others, and I definitely prefer those. That doesn't mean I'm gonna fall in love with one soon, these things only lead to authorianism and I think we can agree between Hitler and Mussolini that's not an aspiring state to live in.

I would love to have a nuanced conversation, because as someone from Europe, I do have a very nuanced view on all of this and I feel bad for the civilians who get caught in the crossfire of these conflicts, but unfortunately you are basically killing any platform where these nuanced conversations are possible when you're trying to strengthen your position by using rhetorical questions.

There's no winners in discussions, and they are only productive if everyone is there to speak, listen, and learn. And that way I can understand why the hell you are doing what you're doing and maybe respect you a bit, while you understand the same about and stop trying to "catch" other people in something. Because that's not what these communities are for and you are being an asshole.

[โ€“] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Reply guy account award

Indistinguishable from AI response award

Imperial core resident award

[โ€“] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reply guy account award

Indistinguishable from AI response award

Imperial core resident award

[โ€“] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago

Wrong wrong and wrong

Clearly we need to level about the basics. You said Iran is threatening other countries. The nations of the world not allied with the US are disappointed Iran didn't finish the job. They responded to being attacked flagrantly in violation of international law. All of Iran's actions were legal.

My question is should we obey religious law, international law, or should we pragmatically eliminate the sources of suffering in our world with what time we have left? Thank goodness that people like you will call yourselves Eurasian within 50 years and we will be less troubled by these questions