this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
414 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

7133 readers
613 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] toxicbubble420@beehaw.org 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

every UBI study has had positive results, but let's run a few more just to be sure..

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago

Well the interesting thing about this article is that it's about a pair of bills, one in the HoC and one in the Senate, to implement a program rather than a study.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There’s a difference between pilot programmes and full implementations

People can’t afford things as is and companies raised their prices just because so imagine how they’d feel with the excuse of UBI

The flip side is they raise prices anyway so you might as well have UBI

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

The flip side is they raise prices anyway so you might as well have UBI

Exactly! They raise costs to increase profits even when their production costs go down due to automation and other system streamlining.