this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
354 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37608 readers
225 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes. Yes he can.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Foreigner@kbin.social 146 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

My guess is Reddit is doing this to temporarily raise traffic. It's like rage bait. They know they're pissing people off and protestors will flood the site, but traffic is traffic. If they can demonstrate engagement it must be good enough for the upcoming IPO.

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Right? I don't understand why people on the fediverse are getting excited about this. At best, Reddit will have admins to insta-wipe anything objectionable. At worst, Reddit will point to the increased engagement as a sign that the protesters gave up and came back.

[–] pizza_rolls@kbin.social 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The best protest would be a blank canvas.

[–] quortez@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's genius honestly. The void should win this year

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Last Week Tonight is on break so The Void should be available for engagements.

[–] ReMikeAble@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I recall watching the The Void form in a timelapse and just how it consumed everything around it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)