this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
605 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
3000 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC moves ahead with Title II net neutrality rules in 3-2 party-line vote::FCC issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking over Republican objections.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

let's zoom out a bit: this thing where every incoming administration changes the rules that the prior administration established is probably worse than either of the rules being permanent. Don't get me wrong, please. This is, as Richard Lewis put in in Robin Hood: Men In Tights, "a good change". But it seems like the rules are constantly changing and that can't be good for people who are actually making a good faith effort to follow them. Doubly so because this article says that ISPs are going to sue to stop this rule change, and that while courts of the past have ruled that the rules say that this rule can be a rule they might rule that this rule cannot, by the rules, be a rule, overturning their previous ruling on the rules surrounding the rules.

But don't worry, if republicans ever win again they'll just make "republicans win" the rule. That will make things very simple.

[–] gothicdecadence@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not only is it one party reverting the changes the other made, but it's almost always along party lines. Drives me crazy as no real change will happen so long as Dem are playing defense forever

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That... Is the point of conservatism right? No progress.

[–] gothicdecadence@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

True, but until there's more than two parties or the Deme start being more aggressive the regressive party will always win long term

this thing where every incoming administration changes the rules that the prior administration established is probably worse than either of the rules being permanent.

I mean... Republicans' rule is objectively bad. Confusion over the rule is not good, but also prevents the bad rule. Maybe I'm weird, but "not bad" seems better than "bad," right?