NBA - Main

15 readers

1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@nba.space

If you replaced Jamal Murray with Trae Young would the Nuggets be better or worse? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by BigDaddyJuno@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically the title. Replace Murray with Trae. Contracts stay the same. Are the Nuggets better or worse now? I’m talking about Trae Young of the Atlanta Hawks by the way

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ct2kKB24@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

They get way better. Everyone saying “trae young is worse off ball” like he doesn’t have to create 99% of the hawks offense. Murray has the benefit of playing off ball because of Jokic.

Also you can have more than 1 elite playmaker on the floor at a time and the offense would be insane. It’s why bron liked having rondo so much, having that sort of passing iq opens up the floor more and takes pressure off of you to do everything.

Trae young is criminally underrated here. Dudes a top 3 passer and lob threat, you put him on the nuggets and they become legit dynasty not just contenders