this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10307 readers
1053 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
otter@piefed.ca
mp3@piefed.ca
17
Residents of Ontario town pondering nuclear crypt take fully paid trip to Finland to see the potential future | CBC (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 2 years ago by troyunrau@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Residents of an Ontario farm community that may become the site for a deep underground facility housing Canada's radioactive waste were given an all-expenses-paid trip to Finland to see first hand what that future might look like.

The municipality of South Bruce has been engaged in a years-long process to decide whether it wants to become host for a $23-billion facility that aims to safely seal away Canada's huge stockpile of nuclear waste for millennia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Opinion: if we want a fossil fuel free future, nuclear is necessary. For nuclear to work, we need waste storage, somewhere. NIMBYism can block a green future. It is one of the few cases where I think Canada should use expropriation if necessary. The needs of the many. However, I'm not opposed to swaying gently either.

I've been to Finland. The interior could be Northern Ontario -- nearly identical landscape.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are also newer reactor designs that can use recycled nuclear material. If we use those reactors we don't have to mine as much fuel.

The recycling process is up to 96% efficient. https://www.orano.group/en/unpacking-nuclear/all-about-used-fuel-processing-and-recycling#:~:text=Orano%20expertise,turn%20generate%20their%20own%20electricity.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree. All of those designs are on-paper designs though, and nothing has ever been built. We should simultaneously be investing in reactor R&D and build some of them.