this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

28 readers
1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know achievements will dictate whether he'll belong or not but as a player, and the skillset he possesses, do you think he will be talked about like how Steph Curry is being talked about as a shoe-in for Top 10 status?

I think yes because at the core of his game, he is a Top 5 offensive player of all time and it would've been sealed had he won MVP and FMVP this year (what a travesty giving it to Embiid). He is statistically as impactful as Michael Jordan and that says a lot.

Looking at his game, he's the perfect offensive center who can do it all minus the athletic feats. He's like Magic Johnson but he's a more reliable and more efficient scorer who mainly playmakes from the high post.

The thing with Jokic is, his game is built to last. It isn't reliant on athleticism and will be a consistent threat unless he retires early. I honestly think he'll be in the mix for Top 10 when all is said and done.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paranoidmoonduck@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Top 10 isn’t really about how good you were at your peak, it’s about how long you were good.

Jolie had had 3 historically great seasons in a row, but he's gonna have to do that for another 5-7 years to make top 10. Would anyone really be surprised if he retires before then?

[–] tkf99@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The top 20 will be the new top 10 over the course of the next decade. Steph is the greatest shooter the game has ever seen with 2 MVPs and 4 titles and is barely in top 10 conversations now.

[–] BoopasaurusRex_____@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He’s Kobe/Duncan/KG tier for me easily

[–] AhmedF@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He should be imo.

[–] rwoteit@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Top 15 maybe. 20 waters it down way too much. From 10 for 75 years to double for 85 years doesn't make sense.

load more comments (6 replies)