this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
28 points (96.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7524 readers
744 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
28
Trump’s E.U. Trade Deal Comes With Impossible Energy Promises (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 3 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The European Union pledged to buy billions of dollars’ worth of energy resources from the United States. Experts say that’s unrealistic and could hurt Europe’s climate goals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

As an EU resident: we promised him that during the next migration of flying unicorns, they would land in the US.

We're not even going to cheat. Unfortunately flying unicorns don't exist.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Nah they caved to the US. Which is BS they should be diversifying away from them.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't fool yourself. You're just going to bend over backwards like all the times in history, when US comes knocking. But do tell us how you're going to boycott them again.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There is nothing to do with the goods that are supposed to be bought, definitely at the price they sell - and the investments are supposed to be made voluntarily by the private sector.

Nobody's going to do it. There's no incentive mechanism and no enforcement mechanism except warm vapour out of politicians' mouths.

Realistically about 30% of this is maybe going to happen.

Also, what "all times in history" are you referring to? I doubt you have an overview of all trade disputes between the US and EU, and their outcomes.