Funny

15025 readers

905 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

467

Accurate (lemmy.ml)

submitted 9 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.sdf.org to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SleepyHarry@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When ChatGPT can and does hallucinate information it disqualifies itself as a reliable source. Citing it as a source is exactly the same level as "my mate Keith said", even if it's more reliable on average than Keith.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Nobody claimed it was a reliable source. However, the fact is that people use it to answer questions anyway - and in cases like this, I think it’s good to let people know where you got the info so they can take it with a grain of salt. The same applies to your friend Kevin, who’s just as likely to confidently spread false info as the truth.

I don't think that shaming people for using chatGPT is useful. They're not going to stop using it - they'll just not tell about it then which is worse.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Oh, they’ll tell. ChatGPT users are the vegans of the digital age.