this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
719 points (98.4% liked)

Malicious Compliance

21847 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

Police solve something like less than 2% of reported crimes.

Even a libertarian can see this is fucking stupid, imagine a restaurant that gets 2% of its orders correct and served in a timely manner.

Police do not primarily exist to solve crimes.

They primarily exist as a goon/thug class to protect property and capital, all other behaviors and effects are ancillary.

If Police wanted to actually lessen crime, they'd either attack its root causes and use significant parts of their budgets to fund affordable housing and public schools, or massively reorient toward pursuing white collar crime, which is often of such a huge financial scale that it basically directly impoverishes society at a large scale.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (15 children)

That figure is a little misleading, but I understand how you picked it up because it’s everywhere.

Police “clear” crimes to be progressed for prosecution.

Prosecutors “prosecute” crimes. It’s this that the 2% figure is aimed at. The clearance rates (the job done by the police) is higher.

According to this article[1], 22% of reported serious crimes led to arrests. 4% (of reported serious crimes) led to convictions. They then halve both of those numbers to account for unreported crimes. The article still uses the 2% figure in the headline despite the nuance in the article.

That might sound academic given the overall point you make still stands. I just thought it was worth mentioning.

1: https://theconversation.com/police-solve-just-2-of-all-major-crimes-143878

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

22% of reported serious crimes led to arrests. 4% (of reported serious crimes) led to convictions

So what I'm reading is that police are wrong or bad at what they do ~~82%~~ most of the time.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)